All Out War 2
http://aow2.drdteam.org/forum/

Your thoughts on FOV
http://aow2.drdteam.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=662
Page 2 of 2

Author:  atac [ Wed Jun 08, 2011 8:59 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Your thoughts on FOV

I'd think that only the sniper rifle would get a scope/zoom. The rest would require free aim. Which also basically means that all guns would require more skill and make fighting more closeranged and actionpacked :D

Author:  Dusk [ Wed Jun 08, 2011 9:06 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Your thoughts on FOV

I'd believe Rifle and Laser Chaingun would be long range weapons too..

Author:  Konda [ Wed Jun 08, 2011 10:08 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Your thoughts on FOV

Dusk wrote:
I'd believe Rifle and Laser Chaingun would be long range weapons too..

Rifle yes, LCG could be classified as mid-to-far-range weapon.
It's pretty simple: If guass, rifle and LCG get scope along with the sniper rifle, you wouldn't change a thing except for the fact that they will be using different zoom crosshairs from the ones they use now :|

Although, those 3 weapons could only have 1 zoom which would be 15% - 20% while the sniper (and binoculars!) would have toggled zoom (20%,50%,75%).

Oh btw,
Offtopic

Author:  Dusk [ Wed Jun 08, 2011 11:09 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Your thoughts on FOV

Konda' wrote:
Dusk wrote:
I'd believe Rifle and Laser Chaingun would be long range weapons too..

Rifle yes, LCG could be classified as mid-to-far-range weapon.
It's pretty simple: If guass, rifle and LCG get scope along with the sniper rifle, you wouldn't change a thing except for the fact that they will be using different zoom crosshairs from the ones they use now :|

Gauss rifle would definitely not get a scope, I'd intend that to be this kind of a free-aim weapon. Rifle and laser chaingun sniping isn't half as bad because you don't lose more than half your health when you get hit by the initial bullet. If you find cover quick enough, that hit will be the only one. Same goes to laser rifle.

Author:  Konda [ Wed Jun 08, 2011 11:29 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Your thoughts on FOV

Good point, although most maps don't support that, but that problem is map-wise.

When you combine some feature suggestions - increase speed, supression, disabling fov except for some weapons, these suggestions along with cover-support map revamps can reduce sniperfests a lot. This shall be the first step to making AOW2 tactical :)

Author:  Decay [ Wed Jun 08, 2011 3:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Your thoughts on FOV

The only weapon that should get a scope is sniper. Really. Realistically speaking (LOL REALISM) most guns lack scopes, only wtfdoyoucallthem i forget but those nubs you aim with. Too much shit goes on with aow for anything other than sniper to deserve a scope. Maybe you can give some weapons half zoom or something. FOV 20 with sniper and FOV 60 with others, such as LCG, RL, or even rifle.

Author:  DuckReconMajor [ Thu Jun 09, 2011 3:12 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Your thoughts on FOV

Medic wrote:
I'd think that only the sniper rifle would get a scope/zoom. The rest would require free aim. Which also basically means that all guns would require more skill and make fighting more closeranged and actionpacked :D

Well now I'm thinking I'm wrong. Taking away FOV will actually hurt those with lower res monitors.

Author:  atac [ Thu Jun 09, 2011 5:27 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Your thoughts on FOV

DuckReconMajor wrote:
Medic wrote:
I'd think that only the sniper rifle would get a scope/zoom. The rest would require free aim. Which also basically means that all guns would require more skill and make fighting more closeranged and actionpacked :D

Well now I'm thinking I'm wrong. Taking away FOV will actually hurt those with lower res monitors.

I don't think it'll be a huge problem unless you play in something lower than 800x600. Almost any monitor made since 2000 supports 1024x768 at the very least. The most common LCD monitors these days are like 1280x1024.

Personally, I don't think this FOV business is a huge deal. Who needs to play AOW in 640x480 anyways?

Author:  leehiufugn911 [ Thu Jun 09, 2011 8:39 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Your thoughts on FOV

i play aow on 640x480.
my comp is too shitty
intel celeron 325, 1 gb ram, integrated graphics, integrated sound etc...

Author:  Konda [ Thu Jun 09, 2011 11:08 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Your thoughts on FOV

Then buy another computer. You might not have the money for a quad core monster, but you can buy something better than what you have now. Also, my old computer had shittier specs than that (256MB ram, 1.3Ghz processor, ...) and yet I could play in 1024x768 with low settings on opengl.

Author:  leehiufugn911 [ Thu Jun 09, 2011 12:09 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Your thoughts on FOV

oh~ (satisfied face)
i'll be building a new machine in the summer holiday, probably sandy bride or ivy bridge(if it comes out) quad core i5, with a great video card. i do have the money for such a monster.
but what i don't have now, is time
(i sense this is veering off the topic...)
but no, i cant run ogl. it lagggggggggggs and sometimes i just get BSOD

Author:  Decay [ Thu Jun 09, 2011 12:56 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Your thoughts on FOV

Running it in such a windowed mode is no excuse, I ran it that small for a long ass time with no problems.

Author:  Konda [ Thu Jun 09, 2011 4:37 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Your thoughts on FOV

Then there's something wrong with your video card.

Author:  atac [ Thu Jun 09, 2011 5:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Your thoughts on FOV

Or uh, you could use software like I do. :V

Author:  leehiufugn911 [ Fri Jun 10, 2011 1:50 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Your thoughts on FOV

640 480 isnt windowed. and i like the doomy feel.

Author:  -=Dark-Slayer=- [ Fri Jun 10, 2011 3:24 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Your thoughts on FOV

leehiufugn911 wrote:
640 480 isnt windowed. and i like the doomy feel.

thats 320x200 in 256 color

Author:  atac [ Fri Jun 10, 2011 4:06 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Your thoughts on FOV

leehiufugn911 wrote:
i play aow on 640x480.
my comp is too shitty
intel celeron 325, 1 gb ram, integrated graphics, integrated sound etc...

That computer can run 1024x768/1280x1024 software without a problem. Why do you insist so much on choking your computer with OGL?

Seriously, there's a computer at my house with Windows XP and 128MB of SDRAM and a 855Mhz Celeron processor, it runs AOW on 1280x1024 at capped framerate just fine, except when there's nukes and fire everywhere.

Author:  Decay [ Fri Jun 10, 2011 5:04 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Your thoughts on FOV

Sounds like baw to me

Page 2 of 2 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/